Skip to content

Conversation

OrigamiDev-Pete
Copy link

Addresses #3804

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot added the bug Something isn't working label Jul 7, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 7, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The version comparison logic in the SameOrLesserPluginVersionExists method within the PluginManager class was updated to use semantic versioning with System.Version objects instead of string-based lexical comparison. No public APIs were changed; the modification is internal to the method.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
Flow.Launcher.Core/Plugin/PluginManager.cs Updated version comparison in SameOrLesserPluginVersionExists to use semantic versioning with System.Version objects instead of string comparison; added error handling for invalid version strings.

Possibly related issues

Suggested labels

enhancement


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 770eec5 and 988a3bc.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Flow.Launcher.Core/Plugin/PluginManager.cs (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • Flow.Launcher.Core/Plugin/PluginManager.cs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Report (PR)
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4fcc12d and 24b87aa.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Flow.Launcher.Core/Plugin/PluginManager.cs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: taooceros
PR: Flow-Launcher/Flow.Launcher#2616
File: Flow.Launcher/Flow.Launcher.csproj:7-7
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:52:58.573Z
Learning: In the Flow Launcher project, the version number in the `Flow.Launcher.csproj` file is dynamically updated during the CI/CD process.
Learnt from: Jack251970
PR: Flow-Launcher/Flow.Launcher#3791
File: Flow.Launcher.Core/Plugin/PluginManager.cs:293-295
Timestamp: 2025-07-01T05:46:13.251Z
Learning: In Flow.Launcher.Core/Plugin/PluginManager.cs, when checking if a plugin is modified within the PluginManager class itself, prefer using the internal static PluginModified(string id) method directly rather than going through API.PluginModified() for better performance and architectural design.
Flow.Launcher.Core/Plugin/PluginManager.cs (3)
Learnt from: Jack251970
PR: Flow-Launcher/Flow.Launcher#3791
File: Flow.Launcher.Core/Plugin/PluginManager.cs:293-295
Timestamp: 2025-07-01T05:46:13.251Z
Learning: In Flow.Launcher.Core/Plugin/PluginManager.cs, when checking if a plugin is modified within the PluginManager class itself, prefer using the internal static PluginModified(string id) method directly rather than going through API.PluginModified() for better performance and architectural design.
Learnt from: taooceros
PR: Flow-Launcher/Flow.Launcher#2616
File: Flow.Launcher/Flow.Launcher.csproj:7-7
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:52:58.573Z
Learning: In the Flow Launcher project, the version number in the `Flow.Launcher.csproj` file is dynamically updated during the CI/CD process.
Learnt from: Jack251970
PR: Flow-Launcher/Flow.Launcher#3572
File: Flow.Launcher/App.xaml.cs:214-216
Timestamp: 2025-07-06T12:21:37.927Z
Learning: In Flow Launcher, the UpdatePluginManifestAsync method in PluginsManifest.cs already has comprehensive internal try-catch handling that logs exceptions and returns false on failure rather than throwing, making external try-catch wrappers unnecessary.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Check Spelling

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 7, 2025
@Jack251970 Jack251970 requested a review from Copilot July 7, 2025 05:57
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR replaces string-based version comparisons with System.Version parsing to ensure more reliable version checks and handles parse failures explicitly.

  • Parse both new and existing plugin versions using Version.TryParse.
  • Throw an exception if the new version string is invalid.
  • Update the comparison logic to use Version operators instead of string.CompareTo.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

Flow.Launcher.Core/Plugin/PluginManager.cs:554

  • This exception references an undefined variable plugin, causing a compile error. Consider using newMetadata.Name or passing the plugin name into this method, and clarify that the exception indicates a version parsing failure rather than a duplicate or greater version.
                throw new InvalidOperationException($"A plugin with the same ID and version already exists, or the version is greater than this downloaded plugin {plugin.Name}");

Copy link
Member

@Jack251970 Jack251970 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for your contribution! It looks good to me!

@Jack251970 Jack251970 enabled auto-merge July 7, 2025 06:01
@Jack251970 Jack251970 added this to the 2.0.0 milestone Jul 7, 2025
@Jack251970 Jack251970 removed the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 7, 2025
@Jack251970 Jack251970 linked an issue Jul 7, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
3 tasks
@Jack251970 Jack251970 merged commit 727390d into Flow-Launcher:dev Jul 7, 2025
4 checks passed
@Jack251970 Jack251970 changed the title Use System.Version to compare versions Fix Metadata Version Comparison Issue Jul 7, 2025
@jjw24 jjw24 modified the milestones: 2.0.0, 1.20.2 Jul 13, 2025
jjw24 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2025
Use System.Version to compare versions
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

BUG: SameOrLesserPluginVersionExists does not compare correctly

3 participants